header-logo header-logo

Redraft ‘confusing’ immigration rules

15 January 2020
Issue: 7870 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
Home Office officials should take a ‘less prescriptive approach to evidence’ and redraft the Immigration Rules to save money, speed up decision-making and build trust, according to the Law Commission

While not making any recommendations on substantive immigration policy, the Law Commission report on the Simplification of the Immigration Rules, published this week, suggests improvements to the way the rules are written and presented could save the government as much as £70m over the next decade. It recommends ‘a complete redrafting’ to make the rules easier for applicants to understand, as well as introducing a twice-yearly limit to updates, in April and October.

It also recommends the Home Office reduce the level of detail and prescription required, as this has led to increasing numbers of amendments and changes, making the rules more complicated.

The Commissioners say these changes would save the Home Office money by reducing mistakes and, consequently, administrative reviews, appeals and judicial reviews.

Nicholas Paines QC, Public Law Commissioner, said: ‘For both applicants and case workers, the drafting of the Immigration Rules and frequent updates makes them too difficult to follow.

‘This has resulted in mistakes that waste time and cost taxpayer money. By improving the drafting, restructuring the layout and removing inconsistencies, our recommendations will make a real difference by saving money and increasing public confidence in the rules.’

In the past decade, the rules have nearly quadrupled in length, stretching to more than 1,100 pages in 2019. The Law Commission described the structure as ‘confusing’ and the numbering system as ‘inconsistent’. Moreover, it found duplication between different types of application and unnecessary repetition within categories.

On evidence, the Law Commission recommended a more flexible approach could involve providing a non-exhaustive list of examples and asking for any other document that meets requirements.

Issue: 7870 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll