header-logo header-logo

14 October 2010
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Record settlement

A permanently paralysed girl has secured the highest ever court-approved settlement for a spinal cord injury after taking the unusual step of suing her mother.

EA, who is nine, will receive more than £12m in the settlement, partly as a lump sum and partly in annual payments. Mr Justice Eady approved the settlement in the High Court last week.

EA was a passenger in her mother’s car when it was in a collision with a Royal Mail delivery lorry in 2004. Following the issue of High Court proceedings, she secured interim payments of more than £1.5m from her mother’s insurers and was able to pay for a suitable bungalow in west London and a team of full-time carers.

She has now returned to mainstream schooling, but is paralysed and dependent on a ventilator to breathe.

Warren Collins, partner at Davies Arnold Cooper, who represented EA, says that even though this may be a very large settlement, it is by no means a “lottery win”.

“The money awarded simply relates to financial losses and future needs. The settlement will mean that EA no longer has to rely upon the state to fund her very expensive care and equipment needs. The damages assessed for her actual injuries are limited by law,” he adds.
For more on this see: www.newlawjournal.co.uk.

Issue: 7437 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll