header-logo header-logo

29 October 2015
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Ready for Pro Bono Week?

Lawyers to celebrate pro bono work with a full calendar of events

Lawyers across the country are busy preparing for the 14th annual National Pro Bono Week.

A multitude of events are due to take place next week (2-6 November), including walk-in surgeries, panel discussions, seminars, training events, open days and quiz nights (the Access to Justice Foundation is organising The Great Legal Quiz on 4 November). A drop-in session is even being held at Parliament to give MPs and caseworkers a chance to talk to experts about the potential pro bono support for constitutents.

Pro Bono Week, sponsored by the Law Society, the Bar Council and CILEx, celebrates the enormous range of vital legal work that lawyers take on free of charge, helping people who otherwise would not be able to afford legal advice and representation.

The Bar Pro Bono Unit, for example, has more than 3,600 volunteer barristers on its panel, including a third of all QCs in England and Wales, and has seen a continuous rise in the number of applications from members of the public who cannot obtain legal aid or pay for a barrister. The number of requests for assistance in family-child cases, for example, has risen by 305% between 2010 and 2014. The unit is holding an open morning on 4 November for members of the Bar, clerks, and referral agencies.

Meanwhile, Joseph Middleton of Doughty Street Chambers has won this year’s Bar Pro Bono Award for his international human rights work in connection with prisoners facing the death penalty in Malawi, and with a pilot programme for vulnerable prisoners in Belize.

Lord Goldsmith, the Bar Pro Bono Unit President and Chair of the Award judging panel, says: “Joseph’s work has not only saved the lives of many prisoners on death row, he has also created legal precedents restricting the use of the death penalty pending its eventual abolition.”

Issue: 7674 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll