header-logo header-logo

Rage of ages

20 October 2007
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

In brief

Age discrimination laws are making waves in the workplace a year after their introduction with about 2,000 claims filed in the first year, Lovells partner Naomi Feinstein says. This is about six times as many claims as were made in the first year the UK religious and sexual orientation discrimination laws were introduced. A key issue for employers, says Feinstein, remains the difficulty in changing ageist workplace mindsets. Those most likely to bring a claim, she says, are the so-called “pale, stale, male” and “POPOs”—those who have been “passed over and are pi**ed off”.

Issue: 7289 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll