header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Radical saving protection scheme on way

Finacial Services

Plans to safeguard consumer savings if banks collapse have been put forward by the government. One proposal would see banks having to pay billions of pounds into a compensation pot to fund up front the depositor compensation scheme. The chancellor’s consultation paper, Financial Stability and Depositor Protection: Strengthening the Framework, also questions whether the current level of saver compensation—100% of the first £35,000—should be extended. Farhaz Khan, a barrister at Outer Temple Chambers, says: “Raising the bar on protection in the present political climate is a relatively easy way to shore up consumer confidence in the banking sector generally because it does not fundamentally alter the mechanics, and legal basis, of the scheme.”

Khan says the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) will still become assignee of the depositor’s legal rights against the bank when a claim is brought: “Importantly, the FSCS assumes the right to execute the claim in a way that is sensible and appropriate in the circumstances.”

Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll