header-logo header-logo

Racing pundit McCririck was "unpalatable"

15 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal rules in favour of Channel 4

Channel 4 racing stalwart John McCririck has lost his age discrimination claim against the station.

McCririck, 73 years old, claimed he was dropped from his presenting job on Channel 4 Racing because of his age, contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Channel 4 said they wanted to change the style and tone of their racing coverage to appeal to a wider audience. McCririck, who is famed for his pantomime chauvinism, hairy whiskers and deerstalker hats, did not fit with this style and put off many viewers, it said. 

However, McCririck said Channel 4 had never asked him to tone his character down, and had not consulted him about the new programme.

Central London employment tribunal unanimously held that the channel had demonstrated a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Delivering their judgment, the tribunal panel said: “The tribunal have taken into account that the evidence in this case is that the aim was to bring horse-racing to a wider audience.

“All the evidence is that Mr McCririck's pantomime persona, as demonstrated on the celebrity television appearances, and his persona when appearing on Channel 4 Racing, together with his self-described bigoted and male chauvinist views were clearly unpalatable to a wide potential audience."

 

Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll