header-logo header-logo

Racing pundit McCririck was "unpalatable"

15 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal rules in favour of Channel 4

Channel 4 racing stalwart John McCririck has lost his age discrimination claim against the station.

McCririck, 73 years old, claimed he was dropped from his presenting job on Channel 4 Racing because of his age, contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Channel 4 said they wanted to change the style and tone of their racing coverage to appeal to a wider audience. McCririck, who is famed for his pantomime chauvinism, hairy whiskers and deerstalker hats, did not fit with this style and put off many viewers, it said. 

However, McCririck said Channel 4 had never asked him to tone his character down, and had not consulted him about the new programme.

Central London employment tribunal unanimously held that the channel had demonstrated a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Delivering their judgment, the tribunal panel said: “The tribunal have taken into account that the evidence in this case is that the aim was to bring horse-racing to a wider audience.

“All the evidence is that Mr McCririck's pantomime persona, as demonstrated on the celebrity television appearances, and his persona when appearing on Channel 4 Racing, together with his self-described bigoted and male chauvinist views were clearly unpalatable to a wide potential audience."

 

Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll