header-logo header-logo

24 May 2013 / Simon Love
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

A question of trust

istock_000020568854medium

Solicitors must take care when handling client accounts, warns Simon Love

In Adelle Challinor v Juliet Bellis & Co [2013] EWHC 347 (Ch), the claimants were a collection of high net worth individuals. For many years, they had invested in property schemes devised by a Mr Egan in his capacity as a director of a property advisory and management company Egan Lawson Limited. These schemes usually involved the creation of a property owning SPV which had the word “Albemarle” in its title.

In 2006, Egan Lawson Ltd was purchased by Erinaceous Group Plc and Egan Lawson Ltd changed its name to Erinaceous Commercial Services Ltd (ECS). ECS continued Egan Lawson’s role as a deviser of property transactions for investors and various schemes (Albemarle Shoreham, Albemarle Croydon and others) were devised and implemented by ECS.

Some investors participated in these schemes as equity investors rather than lenders. The schemes were intended to be tax efficient, and often had complex structures.

In Spring 2007, Erinaceous Group Plc alighted upon a transaction involving the purchase of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll