header-logo header-logo

19 November 2021
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Purpose-driven pro bono

64430
Pro bono practitioners reveal what their work means to them & share top tips to encourage others to take the pro bono plunge
  • Q&A: Why do you do pro bono work?
  • What does the future pro bono landscape look like?

Aaqib Javed of Spire Barristers on the value of helping those who are locked out of the justice system

‘Pro bono work for me has always been a way of recognising that we live in an imperfect society where the needs of often vulnerable and needy people go unmet. Organisations such as Young Legal Aid Lawyers (YLAL) have been instrumental in lobbying on behalf of practitioners who experience the frustrations of seeing these cracks prevent countless individuals from access to justice. As such, pro bono work must be viewed as one way of holding up a creaking justice system while work is done to remedy the flaws that have appeared in our legal aid system.

Despite that rather tempered introduction, I have to stress that doing cases via Advocate and other pro bono organisations has been invaluable for my practice. I have been able to assist people irrespective of their financial status and have had the privilege of getting to know my clients and their life stories. You would be mistaken to think that pro bono work means straightforward work. Unfortunately, practitioners taking on pro bono work will inevitably come across clients who have meritorious and complex cases but who are locked out of the justice system.

Over the last few months, I have been fortunate to have had the capacity to take on pro bono cases touching family and Court of Protection law. A notable case that I have worked on involved advocating the interests of a mother at a final hearing who had sadly suffered from a mental health episode while the child was in her care; without the involvement of a legal professional, she would not have been able to walk away from the proceedings with a structured and well-thought-out plan which would eventually enable her to have direct and unsupervised time with her child.

Chambers, such as my own, have stepped up to offer specialist advice and assistance through partnership with agencies on-the-ground that can triage and direct legal queries accordingly. A more collaborative and joined-up way of doing pro bono helps everyone involved by removing any barriers that inadvertently prohibit individuals from being able to discuss their legal matters with the right type of practitioner.

Spire Barristers’ recent collaboration with Temple Legal Centre also means that pro bono assistance can be given in a manageable way that doesn’t place unrealistic demands on any one barrister offering pro bono advice. I also highlight the fact that quite often, and usually in less complicated cases, a huge difference can be made if a client simply has 10-20 minutes of advice from a specialist lawyer.

I firmly believe that pro bono work could and should form part of any practitioner’s practice. That may sound like a lofty and idealistic statement, but the reality remains that no matter how well-funded the legal aid system may be (and it certainly is not at the moment), there will always be those who, for whatever reason, will be blocked from accessing justice. It would be wrong to suggest pro bono itself is a panacea towards enabling access to justice, but it certainly plays an important part.’


Shaylla Shabbir reports on the endless opportunities for personal development pro bono provides

‘I volunteer with Advocate and have recently been selected to sit on the Young Bar Advocate Committee. Beyond this, I help at my local Citizens Advice and volunteer as and when I can. I have also worked on the Innocence Project. 

Pro bono work makes you stop and think. At the Bar, things are very fast-paced and you will be dealing with so many different cases on a weekly basis. Pro bono work, although ‘just another case’, is important because you realise that this individual has come to you because they have nowhere else to go. It allows you to give something back to the community and boost your own morale. It reminds you why you are doing this job: to help others.

At the Bar there is a great emphasis placed on pro bono work. When you are training, it is one of the best experiences you can get on your CV. I think that the opportunities are endless, and practitioners have realised that it is not only undertaken to benefit a client but it also helps develop your own skills as an advocate. As a junior lawyer, you will find yourself having a lot more control over a case. Pro bono work frequently affords advocates an opportunity to practise in an area of law that isn’t their main practice area. 

From the Bar’s point of view, it seems one of the main drawbacks of doing pro bono work is the worry that there will be no one managing the case with you. Usually, you would have your clerks or an instructing solicitor who is working with the client. The reassurance that there will be support available to you as an advocate will definitely encourage lawyers to get involved. The flexibility in choosing the types of cases you help on is also vital. As mentioned above, one of the main reasons a lawyer may be undertaking pro bono is to get some experience in another field of law, so having the ability to select from a pool of cases is a great way to attract more lawyers to get involved.’

Aaqib Javed is a barrister at Spire Barristers and a member of the Young Legal Aid Lawyers Committee. Shaylla Shabbir sits on the Young Bar Advocate Committee.
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll