header-logo header-logo

20 August 2021
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Public don’t know how to find legal advice

The majority of the public do not understand legal aid or how to find legal support, research by law firm Bolt Burdon Kemp has found

Some 46% of the public said they don’t understand the system or how to go about finding advice while 51% said there are too many barriers to legal aid funding, according to research published by the firm this month, ‘Inequality within Britain’s legal aid funding system’. View the research here.

Cuts to legal aid, through reductions in fees as well as by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) which pulled whole areas out of scope, has led to a reduction in legal aid firms, with firms giving up legal aid work or merging with other firms. In 2011-12, there were 4,257 firms and organisations providing legal aid work, reducing to 2,818 in 2018 and 2,900 today.

Law Society vice president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Many people, particularly those who are living below the poverty line, are regularly denied legal aid by a means test which is too stringent.

‘They face serious and life changing legal issues such as in housing, employment and family law with no recourse to legal advice due to legal aid cuts. The legal aid system needs proper funding, otherwise there will continue to be inequalities between those who can afford to access legal support and those who cannot.’

Issue: 7946 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll