header-logo header-logo

Prosecutors are failing in statutory disclosure duties

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Crown prosecutors are complying properly with the statutory disclosure regime in only around half of cases, a report by HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) has found. Although the breaches did not mean potential miscarriages of justice, the report says, noncompliance resulted in adjournments and ineffective trials while disclosure issues were resolved, in 5.3% of the 152 magistrates’ court and crown court cases observed.

Delays to trials while advocates sorted out disclosure issues were common, impacting on court listing practices and other cases. Juries face significant waits, and the victims, witnesses and defendants are inconvenienced. In the cases scrutinised, the initial duty of disclosure was properly complied with in 56.6% of cases, continuing disclosure in 71.3% of relevant cases and sensitive material in 47.5%. Deficiencies include: description of material in schedules compiled by police disclosure officers; lack of examination of material by prosecutors; and lack of adequate recording of actions, decisions and the reasons for them by prosecutors. Blanket provision of unused material was sometimes made, passing the burden of examining material to the defence which caused delay.

The report says statutory duties for the handling of unused material— under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, as amended by Criminal Justice Act 2003—were found to be onerous by police and prosecutors and the procedure can be convoluted. Stephen Wooler, HM Chief Inspector says: “More consistent and timely compliance with the statutory disclosure regime, with a crown prosecutor having considered the material itself when it is key or sensitive unused material, could reduce the overall resource demands of disclosure.” A CPS spokesperson says the CPS is addressing the issues raised in the report. She adds: “Although the report focuses on the role of the CPS, non-compliance by other players in the criminal justice system…also cause, contribute or add to problems.”

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll