header-logo header-logo

Progress on open justice or administrative fiat?

19 January 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Family , In Court
printer mail-detail
153984
David Burrows raises some questions about the Family Division’s open justice pilot scheme
  • Does the President of the Family Division have administrative powers to set up an open justice pilot scheme; or should this be done by the family proceedings rule makers?
  • Can the President by administrative diktat override a financial remedy party’s anonymity, and without regard for the rights of any children affected?
  • Can the lawfulness of administrative actions be challenged judicially in the family courts proceedings in which they arise?

On 11 December 2023, the president of the Family Division issued guidance on the transparency reporting pilot for financial remedy proceedings. The pilot comes into operation on 29 January 2024. If the guidance is challenged, the pilot scheme may be found unlawful in at least two respects:

  • First, has the president power to set up a ‘pilot’ scheme at all? In this context he is an administrator, so what are his statutory powers (if any) to act in this way?
  • Second, is it lawful
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll