header-logo header-logo

Proceeds of crime

14 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Criminal , In Court
printer mail-detail

Executive Jet Support Ltd v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2012] EWHC 2737 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 40 (Dec)

Section 314(4) provided the test to determine whether it would be wrong to forfeit the recoverable property in the hands of an innocent party. The test was whether the innocent party’s consideration had become executed consideration; if it had not, then the innocent party would not be permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct which he had received but he would retain his consideration. If the innocent party’s consideration had become executed, the innocent party was permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct. Parliament intended that those applications could be made in summary proceedings. Parliament used language which was neither arcane nor obscure to define the circumstances in which recoverable property ceased to be recoverable. It followed that the protection to the innocent purchaser of the value was only provided when the contract has been completed and issues of economic loss on the part of the innocent purchaser were irrelevant.

Section 314(4) had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll