header-logo header-logo

Procedure—Particulars of claim

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Credit Suisse AG v Arabian Aircraft and Equipment Leasing Co EC and others [2013] All ER (D) 27 (Oct)

Particulars of claim were intended to define the claim being made. They were a formal document prepared for legal proceedings and could be expected to identify with care and precision the case the claimant was putting forward. They had to set out the essential allegations of fact on which the claimant relied and which he would seek to prove at trial, but they also had to state the nature of the case that was to be made in order to inform the defendant and the court of the basis on which it was said that the facts gave rise to a right to the remedy being claimed.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll