header-logo header-logo

20 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pressure on tribunals

Results of Senior President of Tribunals' annual report

“Flexibility” has enabled tribunals to be more representative of the general population, according to the Senior President of Tribunals’ annual report.

More than 40% of tribunal judges and members are women, while 10% are from a black, asian and minority ethnic background. Senior President, Sir Jeremy Sullivan attributed this to the fact a number of fee-paid opportunities allow “aspiring judges to experience a judicial role while combining it with other responsibilities”.

However, Mr Justice Charles, President of the Administrative Appeals Chamber, highlighted the fact a grading review that recommended tribunal judges be moved up the pay-scale two years ago has still not been put into effect.

Meanwhile, the workload was increasing, and the introduction of universal credit and other changes to social security is predicted to cause a “significant increase” in work, he said.

Charles J said: “Unsurprisingly, given its dedication and recognition of the present economic problems of the country, this damage has not yet had a knock-on effect on the performance of this chamber. But, if as is expected the workload of the chamber continues to increase, the potential for it having an adverse effect on that performance and on the recruitment of new judges cannot be ignored.”

Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll