header-logo header-logo

30 March 2018
Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Pressure grows in the family courts

The latest Family Court statistics reveal ‘significant pressure’ on the courts, with a record number of private law case disposals where neither party had legal representation, a leading family law solicitor has warned.

According to the Family Court quarterly statistics for October to December 2017, 37% of disposals in private law cases involved unrepresented parties on both sides, the highest on record.

Jo Edwards, partner and head of family at Forsters, said: ‘Couple this with the general increase in the number of applications in private law cases in the recent past, and what one sees is a clogging up of the system by those without representation who, with access to even a little publicly funded legal advice at the outset, may have been signposted into mediation or given information which would have helped them settle their case. 

‘There are also, of course, the unknown numbers who (without legal aid) simply give up and do not pursue money claims or rights to see their children.  Through the additional burden on the court of those who pursue claims unrepresented, and the cost to the state of those who don’t, it is clear that there needs to be an urgent impact assessment of the legal aid cuts made five years ago to try to quantify whether there has really been any saving when taking into account these costs; and whether some limited funding for initial advice should be reintroduced.’

Edwards said other worrying indicators included a gradual increase in the length of time taken to resolve public law/care cases; and the length of time to resolve private law children cases.

The statistics show it took an average of 23 weeks for a private family law case to reach a final order, an increase of a week on the previous fourth quarter.

In care proceedings, however, it took an average of 28 weeks for a care or supervision case to reach first disposal—breaking the 26-week rule for care cases brought in by the Children and Families Act 2014. Some 57% of cases were disposed of within 26 weeks in 2017, down 5% year on year.

Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll