header-logo header-logo

14 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Summary judgment—Appeal

CXX v DXX [2012] EWHC 1535 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Jun)

 

Queen’s Bench Division, Spencer J, 1 Jun 2012

It is not automatically an abuse of process in civil proceedings to seek to show that a criminal conviction was wrong; all depends on the facts. 

Richard Davison (instructed by Bolt Burdon Kemp) for the claimant. Satinder Hunjan QC (instructed by Hutton’s) for the defendant.

The claimant was a medical secretary working at the hospital at which the defendant worked as a consultant physician. In 2007, they began a sexual relationship. The claimant became pregnant. She informed the defendant and he tried to persuade her to have an abortion. She alleged that on three occasions he administered or attempted to administer drugs to her in order to procure an abortion.

She alleged that that was done by placing the drugs into her drinks. The defendant was convicted of attempting to administer poison on two of the alleged occasions. He was refused permission to appeal against conviction by the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll