header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Striking out—Power to strike out claim following trial

Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers [2012] UKSC 26, [2012] All ER (D) 179 (Jun)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson and Lord Reed SCJJ, 27 Jun 2012

Following a trial at which the court has found a defendant liable in damages to the claimant in an ascertained sum, the court nevertheless retains power to strike out the claimant’s statement of case on the basis that it is an abuse of process, though the power is for exceptional circumstances.

Craig Sephton QC and Hugh Davies (instructed by SAS Daniels LLP) for the employee. William Norris QC, James Todd and Sadie Crapper (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP) for the employer.

In May 2003, while employed by the defendant, the claimant was injured in an accident at work. He suffered two fractures. In October 2003, the defendant admitted liability. The claimant brought a claim alleging breach of duty or negligence. Following a trial, in August 2007, the claimant obtained judgment on liability with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll