header-logo header-logo

Practice & procedure

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Omni Laboratories Inc v Eden Energy Ltd [2011] EWHC 2169 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 92 (Aug)

It was wholly inappropriate to seek to use the pre-trial review, unless there was more than adequate time, to tack on important applications which one or other party wished to make. It should be for either party to make any application which it believed it was entitled to, but it was quite wrong, generally, to seek to use the pre-trial review as a vehicle to do that. Practitioners and parties should be encouraged to take out specific applications with specific application times for their applications to be heard and not to try to tack them onto the pre-trial review.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll