header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Pre-trial or post judgment relief—Freezing orders

Mobile Telesystems Finance SA v Nomihold Securities Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1040

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward and Tomlinson LJJ, 1 Sept 2011

Both as a matter of principle and on authority a freezing order granted in aid of enforcement of an arbitration award ought ordinarily to contain an ordinary course of business exception.

Vernon Flynn QC and Tom Smith (instructed by Latham & Watkins Solicitors) for the appellant. Simon Salzedo QC and Tony Singla (instructed by Simmons & Simmons Solicitors) for the respondent.

The appellant, MTSF, was a Luxembourg company which was part of a wider group of telecommunication companies. The immediate parent of MTSF was MTS OJSC, a Russian company. MTSF had been set up purely to secure tax benefits to MTS OJSC. In 2005, the respondent, Nomihold, entered into a sale and purchase agreement with MTSF. After the parties fell out Nomihold began arbitration proceedings in London. It obtained an award in its favour in November 2010, in the sum of about $US208m. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll