header-logo header-logo

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Parties—Representative proceedings

Millharbour Management Ltd and others v Weston Homes Ltd and another company, [2011] EWHC 661 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 308 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court Akenhead J, 22 Mar 2011

The Technology and Construction Court has given guidance as to the circumstances in which a party can effectively secure that it acts as a representative on behalf of other persons who are not parties to the proceedings, under CPR 19.6 (1).

Anthony Speaight QC (instructed by Cubism Law) for the claimants. David Friedman QC and James Leabeater (instructed by MacFarlanes) for the defendants.

The first claimant was the management company for a property. Eighty eight of the flats were social housing, sold on a 999 year lease to the second claimant housing association, which sub-let them to tenants. The remainder were sold to individual tenants. In 2010, the first and second claimants, together with 42 private leaseholders, issued proceedings against the defendants for alleged breaches of the Defective Premises Act 1972 in relation to the construction of the development, and against the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll