header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Appeal—CPR 39.3

Bank of Scotland v Pereira and others [2011] EWCA Civ 241, [2011] All ER (D) 94 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Lloyd and Gross LJJ, 9 Mar 2011

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, issued guidance in relation to a defendant’s application under CPR 39.3 to set aside an order, and an attempt to appeal against that order.

Joanna Shaw (instructed by Paul Smith & Co) for the first defendant. Gary Lidington (instructed by Aldridge and Brownlee) for the the second and third defendants.

An order was made on 21 June 2007 (the 2007 order), against the first defendant, in her absence. She applied to set aside parts of the order, pursuant to CPR 39.3. The judge dismissed the application and she appealed. She also sought permission to appeal against the 2007 order itself.

Lord Neuberger MR:

While the purpose of CPR 39.3 was readily apparent, the relationship between a defendant’s application under CPR 39.3 to set aside an order, and any attempt to appeal against the order, was more difficult. There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll