header-logo header-logo

Power to the people

27 April 2018 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
nlj_7790_moore

Sarah Moore reviews the current state of product liability in the UK, & asks: is it time for a consumer revolution?

  • A recently announced review may be a sign that the regulatory and legislative frameworks surrounding pharmaceuticals and medical devices are no longer fit for purpose.

On 21 February 2018, the government announced an official review into the way in which consumer concerns have been handled by regulators and lawmakers in the UK. The review, to be chaired by Baroness Cumberlege, will focus on three specific products marketed historically and/or currently within the UK, including:

  • Primodos—a hormone-based pregnancy test used in the UK between 1953-75 which campaigners allege has caused birth defects in their children.
  • Sodium Valproate—a drug to control epilepsy, marketed in the UK since the 1970s and still available; alleged to have caused physical and cognitive birth defects in children born to mothers using the drug at the time of conception.
  • Vaginal mesh—a medical device, still available in the UK, allegedly associated with extreme pain and damage to internal organs of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll