header-logo header-logo

27 April 2018 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

nlj_7790_moore

Sarah Moore reviews the current state of product liability in the UK, & asks: is it time for a consumer revolution?

  • A recently announced review may be a sign that the regulatory and legislative frameworks surrounding pharmaceuticals and medical devices are no longer fit for purpose.

On 21 February 2018, the government announced an official review into the way in which consumer concerns have been handled by regulators and lawmakers in the UK. The review, to be chaired by Baroness Cumberlege, will focus on three specific products marketed historically and/or currently within the UK, including:

  • Primodos—a hormone-based pregnancy test used in the UK between 1953-75 which campaigners allege has caused birth defects in their children.
  • Sodium Valproate—a drug to control epilepsy, marketed in the UK since the 1970s and still available; alleged to have caused physical and cognitive birth defects in children born to mothers using the drug at the time of conception.
  • Vaginal mesh—a medical device, still available in the UK, allegedly associated with extreme pain and damage to internal organs of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll