header-logo header-logo

11 October 2018
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Populists threaten rule of law

The rule of law is receiving a ‘battering’ in ‘turbulent global political times’, the president of the International Bar Association (IBA) has warned.

Speaking in Rome this week at the IBA’s annual conference, Martin Šolc said a growing number of countries were ‘led or influenced by populists with no ideology, promising what their disaffected electorate wants to hear, often mainly reactionary change, an appeal to greater safety and efficiency, end of so-called elite establishment status quo, solutions that appeal to sectors of the public feeling disappointed or threatened by globalisation’.

The IBA has launched an education campaign to highlight the significance of the rule of law in everyday life, including eight short videos, each depicting one element of the rule of law, such as the right to a fair trial. The catchphrase for the videos is, ‘Look after the rule of law and it will look after you’.

Šolc asked all those present to download the videos and show them to as many people as possible to ‘create an avalanche’.

More than 5,000 individuals representing more than 2,700 law firms, corporations, governments and regulators are currently attending the conference in Rome. Romano Prodi, who was twice elected prime minister of Italy and who served as president of the European Commission (1999-2004) gave the keynote speech.

Prodi echoed Šolc’s warning on the rule of law, as populists are exploiting inequality and perceived negative consequences of globalisation.

He told the conference that he believed Brexit would be ‘painful and difficult’ but expressed doubt that a second referendum, if held, would yield a different result because he had to deal with ‘British exceptions’ on small things every day when he led the European Commission. However, he said he believed a compromise would be reached, safeguarding free trade at the expense of freedom of movement and social projects.

Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll