header-logo header-logo

20 November 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Points of view

nlj_7677_zander

Michael Zander QC considers an interesting contribution to the debate on scrapping the Human Rights Act

The Conservative Party Manifesto for the 2015 election included a commitment to “scrap the Human Rights Act and introduce a British Bill of Rights”. On 8 September, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Dominic Raab, told the House of Commons that the government would bring forward proposals “in the autumn”. On 3 November, Mr Jonathan Fisher QC, who was the Conservative party’s nominee on the coalition government’s Bill of Rights Commission, spoke to Politiae about what those proposals should contain.

Be bold

The government, he said, should be bold. “The UK Bill of Rights must be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, but its terms should not be replicated”. The Bill of Rights should protect such basic British values as the right to trial by jury in serious criminal cases, the right to silence, the right to claim privilege against self-incrimination, the right to present a writ of habeas corpus, the right to equality,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll