header-logo header-logo

02 December 2014
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Philip Jones—Mackrell Turner Garrett

In-house barrister joins firm

Mackrell Turner Garrett have become one of first law firms of its size to hire a full-time in-house barrister.

Consultant barrister Philip Jones will work with the firm’s award winning litigation department.

Called to the Bar in November 1990, Philip has spent 24 years in practice at the independent bar, of which the last 18 have been at the chambers of Andrew Ritchie QC, 9 Gough Square.

Philip brings to Mackrell’s a broad based civil dispute resolution practice which covers areas including commercial/contract disputes, employment, civil fraud, insolvency, property and landlord & tenant, and professional negligence. Clients have included individuals (including groups of individuals), public-sector organisations and large companies in the private sector including Pears Group, Pearl & Coutts and Thames Water.

Nigel Rowley, managing partner at Mackrell Turner Garrett and head of litigation, says: “Hiring an in-house barrister is fairly unique for a firm of our size and is something we have been looking to do for a long time.

“Having an on-site barrister allows unparalleled access and free flow of communication between lawyers which will ultimately benefit our clients. We are also able to get counsel involved in cases at the earliest opportunity, enhancing the quality of case management and providing great continuity.

“Philip joins Mackrell Turner Garrett following a distinguished career with more than 20 years in independent practice. He brings extensive experience in a number of practice areas so we are delighted that he has agreed to join us. This move will only enhance our service on offer to clients.”

Issue: 7633 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll