header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Martin Porter KC
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Personal injury: Blame the victim

Martin Porter QC comments on a ruling which will send shivers down the spines of cyclists

On a summer's evening in 2005, Robert Smith, cycled the short distance from his home to another house in Brightlingsea, Essex. Just before he reached his destination, a motorcycle ridden by Michael Finch collided with the bicycle and as a consequence Smith sustained a serious traumatic brain injury.

Judgment in Smith v Finch [2009] EWCH 53 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 158 (Jan) was handed down by Mr Justice Griffith Williams on 22 January 2009. He accepted the claimant's case that the accident happened while the claimant was close to the centre of the road preparing to turn right into the driveway of his destination and when the motorcyclist, travelling at excessive speed in the same direction, tried to overtake him on the offside. He rejected the defendant's case that the claimant had come out of a side road to the motorcyclist's left straight into his path. So far, so commonplace a resolution of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Corporate team welcomes paralegal in Southampton

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

London firm strengthens real estate team with partner appointment

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll