header-logo header-logo

29 August 2023
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Perilous state of civil legal aid

An investment of £11.3m in early legal advice providers is needed urgently, the Law Society has warned.

Otherwise, civil legal aid will ‘vanish’, just at a time when millions of people are struggling with debt, housing costs and the cost-of-living crisis.

The number of new legal aid cases has fallen 77% in the past decade due to both cuts in areas of legal aid brought about by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) and fewer lawyers working in legal aid as the practice area became financially unviable, the Law Society said. It noted LASPO led to a reduction in early advice cases, as legal aid was cut from a swathe of practice areas. However, it also highlighted a reduction in cases where legal aid remains available. For example, there has been a 77% reduction in early advice in community care cases, suggesting the low fees paid for this work may be the reason. Civil legal aid fees have not increased since 1996.

In a plea to justice secretary Alex Chalk KC this week, Law Society president Lubna Shuja called for more investment in early advice to stop problems escalating into homelessness and repossession. 

Shuja said: ‘Early legal advice is vanishing and people are unable to get the advice they need when they need it most.

‘The government’s review of civil legal aid is not expected to report until 2024, with any recommendations taking even longer to implement. To sustain the civil legal aid system until this time, the justice secretary must urgently implement an interim 15% increase (£11.3m) for providers of early legal advice now.

‘Law Society analysis suggests that the number of civil legal aid providers could drop by a third by 2025, leaving many without access to a lawyer when they desperately need one.’

Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll