header-logo header-logo

29 September 2016
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pensions World survey 2016

Pensions lawyers are in demand as a result of the Brexit vote and pensions reform, according to Pensions World’ s annual survey.

James Thomas, financial journalist, who carried out the research, says: “The future outlook is for work, work and more work. This is due in part to the recent Brexit vote, which has amplified many pre-referendum priorities and trends, creating additional demand for legal advice and services.”

He found that market volatility, falling gilt yields and historically low interest rates are focusing minds on funding deficits, de-risking strategies and liability management in the area of defined benefits pensions. On the defined contribution side, reforms, governance issues and the recently developed DC code will “create significant work”.

Paul Stannard of Travers Smith and Robert West of Baker & McKenzie (who was also top lawyer last year) were voted the best all round pensions lawyer in the survey. Mark Atkinson of CMS Cameron McKenna was runner up.

Five lawyers shared the litigators’ prize: Isabel Nurse-Marsh of Pinsent Masons; Angela Dimsdale-Gill of Hogan Lovells (a runner up for the past two years); Giles Orton of Eversheds (who topped the poll last year); Claire Carroll of Eversheds and Andrew Simmonds QC of 5 Stone Buildings (who was also mentioned in despatches last year).

Three lawyers shared the honours as top up-and-coming lawyers: Arron Slocombe of Baker & McKenzie; Justin McGilloway of Wedlake Bell and Edwards Sawyer of Wilberforce Chambers.

Capital Cranfield and BESTrustees (who also topped the poll last year) received the most votes for top independent trustee with ITS as runner up.

Issue: 7716 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll