header-logo header-logo

02 November 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pension winners

Robert West, partner at Baker & McKenzie, has been voted the best all round pensions lawyer, in Pensions World magazine’s annual survey.

Linklater’s Tim Cox was the runner-up, with Travers Smith’s Paul Stannard and CMS Cameron McKenna’s Mark Atkinson in hot pursuit.

The survey, comprising 38 of the top pensions law firms, appears in the November 2015 issue of Pensions World.

The top litigator was Eversheds’ Giles Horton, closely followed by Hogan Lovell’s Angela Dimsdale-Gill.

The top place in the up-and-coming lawyer category was shared between Sackers’ Claire van Rees and Addleshaw Goddard’s Rachel Uttley. BESTrustees received the most votes for top independent trustee with Law Debenture as runner up.

According to the survey, new workstreams are opening up for pensions lawyers, as clients grapple with the new pensions freedoms introduced in the 2014 budget as well as more intense regulation of defined contribution schemes and the ongoing industry trend for de-risking.

Traditional client bases are expanding—Pinsent Masons, for example, reports a recent expansion in its defined contribution client base, which now includes providers of master trusts, trustees of traditional occupational DC schemes, personal pension scheme providers, annuity providers, benefit consultants and investment specialists. Similarly, CMS Cameron McKenna’s traditional client base of trustees and employers has broadened to include insurers, personal pension and master trust providers.

James Thomas, financial journalist, who carried out the research, says: “The needs of clients will continue to show greater diversity and complexity going forward within an ever more demanding and discriminating marketplace.” 

Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll