header-logo header-logo

Pension benefits

17 October 2018
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-detail

A transfer of funds to a personal pension plan is a transfer of value for inheritance tax purposes, the Court of Appeal has held. In HMRC v Parry [2018] EWCA Civ 2266, Mrs Staveley (deceased) had received a share of her ex-husband’s company pension fund after an acrimonious divorce.

She transferred the fund into what was then known as a ‘section 32 buyout’, which gave the advantage of a purchase exemption. Six years later, in 2006, Mrs Staveley transferred her fund into a personal pension plan. She died less than two months later.

If the pension had remained in the section 32 policy then a lump sum would have been payable to her estate and inheritance tax levied. Under the personal pension plan, Mrs Staveley’s two sons would receive the benefit direct on her death and, if the purchase exemption applied, there would be no inheritance tax to pay.

Allowing HMRC’s appeal, however, the court held that Mrs Staveley had intended to confer a gratuitous benefit on her sons.

Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll