header-logo header-logo

Peers see off attacks on legal aid

05 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord McNally promises amendment to controversial regulation

Justice minister Lord McNally has promised Parliament that the government will amend a controversial regulation that makes it “virtually impossible” for people to claim legal aid for judicial review, homelessness and habeas corpus cases.

Although peers passed the Civil Legal Aid (Merits Criteria) Regulations 2012 in the House of Lords this week, Lord McNally gave a promise to the House that reg 53(b) would be amended by April.

Under reg 53(b), the director of legal aid casework must be satisfied that the applicant has “exhausted all administrative appeals and other alternative procedures for challenge before bringing a public law claim”. This gives the director no discretion to grant legal aid, even where the matter is urgent.

According to the Legal Aid Practitioners Group, this would have forced people in urgent need of access to a judge to go through complex complaints procedures first and would delay their case for “months, if not years”.

Lord McNally told the House that the government would bring forward amendments to “introduce discretion into reg 53(b) so that the director of legal aid casework will have the express power to grant legal aid for public law claims, even if the alternative routes have not been exhausted, if he nonetheless considers that such an appeal or procedure would not be effective in providing the remedy that the individual requires”.

Peers also rejected a regulation that would have denied legal aid for people appealing welfare benefits in first-tier tribunals, in a rare fatal defeat of a government regulation.

Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll