header-logo header-logo

20 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pay rise for lawyers

Nearly six out of 10 legal professionals had a pay rise last year – more than in the accountancy, IT and marketing professions – but only 37% of lawyers received a bonus.

Lawyers’ salaries rose at a faster rate than many other professionals in 2012, with contractors’ rates jumping 3.5 per cent, according to the Robert Walters' Salary Survey.

Permanent legal salaries rose 1.2 per cent in the year ending January 2013.

Those in the Midlands fared best, with an average 2.1 per cent rise.
By comparison, permanent salaries rose 0.3 per cent for IT professionals and 0.7 per cent for banking operations professionals, and fell 0.1 per cent for accountants.

The survey showed the legal in-house market was the main driver of growth – contract pay in the banking and financial services sector rose 8.5 per cent in the last year. Overall, in-house permanent salaries in London rose 1.7 per cent (compared to 0.2 per cent in private practice).

Colin Loth, director of legal recruitment at Robert Walters, said: “While the majority of permanent legal salaries have remained relatively stable, they have still increased and at a faster rate than many other professions.

“However, the most significant growth in pay over the past year has been for contractors. Where headcount restrictions have been implemented, businesses have often not had the expertise to carry out certain projects.

“Rather than outsourcing to a private practice firm, many have hired contractors to carry out this specialist work. With this likely to remain the case, we expect demand for temporary and fixed term contract lawyers to continue to grow throughout the first half of the year.”
 

Issue: 7553 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll