header-logo header-logo

Patents and patents and trade marks

22 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Patents and Patents and Trade Marks (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2010 (SI 2010/33)

Amend the Patents Rules 2007, (SI 2007/3291), the Patents (Fees) Rules 2007, (SI 2007/3292) and the Trade Marks (Fees) Rules 2008, (SI 2008/1958).

The Trade Marks (Fees) Rules are amended by rules 13 and 14 which introduce a fee of £50 where Trade Mark Forms TM24, TM50 or TM51 are filed requesting to enter details in the Register of Trade Marks in accordance with rule 49 of the Trade Marks Rules 2008, (SI 2008/1797).

 

In force : 6 April 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll