header-logo header-logo

Patently Plausible

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In brief

A patent specification need not show that the invention actually works, but must disclose enough to make the invention plausible, the House of Lords has ruled. In Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Incorporated the law lords considered the question of whether a claimed invention has an “inventive step”. The High Court and the Court of Appeal had found that the patent in this case lacked inventive step because the specification did not solve the problem underlying the claimed invention. However, the law lords ruled that courts should look to the patent claims and not the specification to identify the inventive step and determine obviousness.

Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll