header-logo header-logo

Patent concern

10 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MPs concerned over UPC proposals

MPs have highlighted concerns over proposals for the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which aims to offer patent protection in 25 EU member states at an affordable cost.

In a report published last week, the European Scrutiny Committee concluded the draft agreement on the UPC would hinder rather than help the enforcement of patents in the EU, would increase litigation costs for small and medium-sized businesses and be more burdensome than the existing system in the UK. It has called on the government to ensure the UPC is headquartered in London. It has called on the government to ensure the UPC is headquartered in London.

Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll