header-logo header-logo

25 November 2022 / Rachel Davenport
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Features , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail

*Partner copy* Alcohol monitoring technology: what you need to know

101253
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, discusses alcohol monitoring technology, and how it can be used to evidence levels and patterns of alcohol consumption or sobriety.

Although laboratory testing using blood, hair and nail samples can provide a historic overview of a client’s alcohol consumption, alcohol monitoring technology can be very powerful for monitoring their current and ongoing use of alcohol.

This technology includes real-time monitoring in the form of breathalysers, and continuous alcohol monitoring using ankle monitors, both of which can be used to monitor alcohol consumption and encourage client accountability.

Ankle monitoring tags

An ankle monitoring tag is a non-invasive device that can be worn discreetly around the ankle, detecting traces of alcohol in sweat.

At AlphaBiolabs, we offer SCRAM Continuous Alcohol Monitoring® (SCRAM CAM®), an ankle bracelet that monitors alcohol consumption 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for as long as the device is worn.

The bracelet works by using transdermal analysis to sample and test the perspiration that is always on the skin, known as insensible perspiration.

Firstly, a pump inside the bracelet takes in the sample. Then a fuel cell, just like the kind used in breath test devices, reacts with ethanol to measure the presence of alcohol. A sample of insensible perspiration is taken automatically every 30 minutes to measure for alcohol consumption.

For reporting purposes, testing data is transferred from the device to a separate base station inside the client’s premises. The base station communicates directly with the online monitoring system, uploading daily alerts which can be reviewed by the instructing party, with any drinking events flagged by the next working day.

Breath testing

Breath testing using a breathalyser device is most used by law enforcement for roadside alcohol testing but can also be used as a form of longer-term monitoring.

Our recommended breath testing for family law firms and local authorities overseeing co-parenting, custody and access arrangements is the SmartMobile™ Portable Alcohol Monitoring device.

A small, handheld testing device, SmartMobile provides scheduled, random, and on-demand breath alcohol testing, requiring the user to blow into a removable mouthpiece.

A built-in camera provides facial detection to prevent tampering and optional GPS tracking is also a feature.

The device uploads the test data to an online portal after each test is completed, from which reports can then be downloaded.

Scaled monitoring

Both SCRAM CAM and SmartMobile can be used independently, depending on the preference of the parties involved. They can also be used in succession, as part of a scaled monitoring programme.

Where alcohol testing has been performed using blood, hair or nail samples, and alcohol intake has been reduced, an ankle tag such as the SCRAM CAM bracelet is the next logical step in monitoring.

Most suitable for higher risk clients, it requires no active participation, as the bracelet is always worn around the ankle, and automatically takes readings every 30 minutes. When used in family law and childcare proceedings, it is a highly effective assessment tool for individuals struggling with alcohol misuse or seeking to produce evidence for courts regarding acceptable drinking behaviours.

Where clients have reduced their alcohol intake while wearing the SCRAM CAM, SmartMobile can then be used as a follow-up method of monitoring, encouraging participation in the form of scheduled breath tests, and placing more accountability on the client.

SmartMobile is most useful for lower-risk alcohol users and is particularly suitable for clients with joint custody of children or who only require monitoring at the times when the children are in their care.

Whatever the reasons for monitoring, both SCRAM CAM and SmartMobile eliminate the need for the client to attend testing centres – a significant benefit for all involved.

Court-approved alcohol monitoring from AlphaBiolabs

Understanding alcohol monitoring technology and the benefits of different testing devices, can help you make the best decision for your client.

Our nationwide network of professional sample collectors are fully trained to set up both forms of alcohol monitoring technology, and our test results are accepted by Family Courts, the Ministry of Justice, and the Child Maintenance Service.

Legal clients can claim 10% off SCRAM CAM® and SmartMobile™ alcohol monitoring until 31 December 2022, including free weekly, fortnightly, or monthly reporting for both systems, and free daily alerts for SCRAM. Simply cite ALC10 when requesting your quote.

For expert advice on which solution would best suit your client, call our Customer Services team on 0333 600 1300 or email testing@alphabiolabs.com and a member of our Legal team will be in touch.


Rachel Davenport is Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, the UK’s leading laboratory providing UKAS-accredited DNA, drug, and alcohol testing services for the legal sector. Since establishing the company in 2004, Rachel has continued to ensure that the range of services offered remain at the forefront of innovation and value, supporting family law professionals, social workers, and local authorities with court-approved solutions for family law cases.

For further information please contact AlphaBiolabs on 0333 600 1300, email testing@alphabiolabs.com or visit www.alphabiolabs.co.uk

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll