header-logo header-logo

Parliamentary privilege abused

12 September 2025 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
229571
Professor Graham Zellick KC questions why parliamentarians are able to misuse their immunity with impunity

I have little in common with the shopkeeper and businessman Sir Philip Green, but one thing we do share is that we have both been the victim of an abuse of parliamentary privilege.

The circumstances were very different, however. One case concerned the disclosure of a truth suppressed by court order; the other the promulgation of a deliberate lie. In Green’s case, his name was revealed in the House of Lords contrary to the terms of an interim injunction and anonymity order issued by the Court of Appeal, designed to protect his reputation pending trial of a civil action. In my case, a member of Parliament (whom I prefer not to name, allowing him to rest in well-earned obscurity) simply told a lie about me that amounted to a serious attack on my professional integrity. Neither the peer nor the late MP suffered any sanctions or consequences.

Green took his case to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll