header-logo header-logo

12 August 2016 / Linda Monaci
Issue: 7711 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Painful times

istock_18495936_large

Linda Monaci provides an overview of cognitive symptoms of chronic pain

Pain is commonly defined as chronic when it exists for longer than the expected timeframe for healing. The most common definitions consider pain to be chronic when it continues beyond between periods of three or six months (Ashburn & Staats, 1999; Turk & Okifuji, 2001). It can occur in the presence of actual or potential identifiable tissue damage, injury or pathology. A publication that summarised two systematic reviews and 13 primary studies found that when the classification of the International Association for the Study of Pain was used, ie chronic pain as “pain that persists beyond the point at which healing would be expected to be complete or that occurs in disease processes where healing would not be expected to take place”, the mean prevalence of chronic pain in adults seen in primary care settings was 35.5%, ranging between 10.5-55.2% (Ospina & Hartstall, 2002). Chronic pain has significant costs, for instance in the UK the direct cost associated with chronic back pain was estimated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll