header-logo header-logo

Over-stressed lawyers lack sleep

22 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors make the top 10 of most sleepless professions

If you see bloodshot eyes and a haggard face in the mirror each morning then console yourself with this thought—you’re not alone.

Solicitors are in the top 10 most sleepless professions for the second year running, with an average nightly shut-eye of just six hours and 53 minutes.
And if Gordon Brown “visited” you last night, fear not—the prime minister has haunted the dreams of one in five professionals.

Solicitors were ninth on this year’s Travelodge “Sleep and Professions” study of more than 6,000 UK workers. Teachers topped the list, with an average of six hours and three minutes during the week. Next were civil servants, doctors and nurses, and builders.

An unlucky 20% of respondents report having a work related nightmare at least once a week during the working week. The top three nightmares are: being chased by your boss; falling from a great height; and being stranded.     
Thirty per cent of workers can’t sleep at night because of work worries, and 46% spend their weekends catching up on sleep missed during the week.
Anna Buttimore, administrator at LawCare, a support service for lawyers, said: “Our helpline is busier than it’s ever been, although that could be partly due to our receiving more publicity.

“We are receiving an enormous amount of calls from lawyers—we are 15% up on last year, and a lot of calls are to do with financial matters. Not getting enough sleep is a typical symptom of stress, whether it’s because they’re worried at night or working hard and unable to switch off at night.”

LawCare has opened 457 case files in 2009 to date, and received 2,000 calls. One quarter concerned redundancy (or fear of); 24% concerned financial problems; 20% concerned disciplinary matters; 17% were because of bullying; and the rest were to do with relationships, ethical matters or bereavement.

Eight per cent of callers said they were clinically depressed.
Ewan Crawford, senior sleep investigator from Edinburgh Sleep Centre saYS: “Even though the credit crunch has moved on a year, the economic climate is still fuelling this sleep disorder.

“Money worries and concerns regarding job security are the two key drivers of stress; which in turn are leading to significant sleep loss across the British workforce. Having sleepless nights on a long term basis can be very detrimental on your health and it will affect your productivity and overall well being.”

Over-stressed lawyers could consider becoming accountants, one of the best-slept professions with a nightly average of seven hours and 24 minutes.

Issue: 7390 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll