header-logo header-logo

Over the limit?

20 November 2014 / David Locke
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail
carousel_cover

Is the criminalisation of excessive alcohol consumption during pregnancy possible, asks David Locke

The Court of Appeal is currently considering its judgment in what some seek to portray as a landmark case. It is, however, no more than another footnote in what is a philosophical, moral and legal debate of many years standing, in this jurisdiction and others.

The appeal is an attempt to secure criminal injuries compensation for a child born with foetal alcohol syndrome, as a result of alcohol consumption by the mother during pregnancy. To obtain such compensation it is necessary for the child to be classified as the victim of a crime, committed when it was a foetus. Moreover, it is necessary for the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy to constitute a criminal offence, in the particular circumstances.

The court will hand down its judgment in due course, but in the interim the supposed implications are providing fertile ground for discussion and no little misunderstanding.

The foetus as a victim

The position under the criminal law was considered comprehensively

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll