header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Outsourcing rise

Nearly one in six law firms is now outsourcing part of its business functions and demand is likely to rise when new entrants join the legal services market next year.

Some 57% of the top 200 law firms outsource some business functions, mainly technology and administrative services, according to a survey commissioned by DDC Outsourcing Solutions, 38% use specialist companies for their IT functions, and 29% outsource some or all of their typing or copying work.

Law firms cited cost and reputation as the two most important factors when selecting an outsourcing partner. Some 62% of law firm partners taking part in the research said they prefer to outsource within the UK rather than overseas.

“Although this survey only provides a snapshot of a large and complex sector, there was interestingly no direct correlation between the size of law firms and their appetite for outsourcing,” said Mark Smith, commercial director of DDC Outsourcing Solutions.

“In fact, small firms are just as likely to outsource as large practices.”
Smith said he expected demand to rise when new businesses enter the legal market next October under the Legal Services Act reforms.

“Faced with the prospect of increased competition, law firms are under pressure to commoditise their products—especially those seeking to attract outside investment. Those who insist on keeping everything in-house could soon find themselves outgunned on price and service.”

 

Issue: 7440 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll