header-logo header-logo

Outsmarting technology

15 December 2011 / Andrew Pike
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Andrew Pike monitors the risks associated with e-discovery

E-discovery. Sounds as though it could be something to do with food additives but in practice it’s a subject which is currently attracting a lot of attention in business circles. E-discovery (short for electronic discovery) essentially refers to the process of recovering e-mail, SMS and other electronic forms of information when it is required for litigation or other commercial purposes.

New risk

More and more employees now have a smart phone or even a tablet computer supplied by their employer which allows flexible working like never before. New technology, of course, brings with it new risks and smartphones and other similar devices are no exception. Businesses are increasingly required to preserve and collect data from an employee’s mobile device for litigation or as part of an investigation.

The dangers of electronic technology first came to the fore in the UK in 1997 when certain employees of Norwich Union falsely suggested in e-mail correspondence that Western Provident Association was insolvent. This resulted in a High Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll