header-logo header-logo

Out with the old?

24 February 2011 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Court of Protection Rules—a new start, asks Malcolm Skinner

The Court of Protection Rules Committee (set up in December 2009 to undertake a review of the 2007 Rules and the practice and directions that supplemented them) reported on 29 July 2010 and its recommendations were accepted by the president of the Court of Protection. The proposals were directed at speeding up the processes and making the non-contentious cases that came before the court less time-consuming and easier to conclude.

There were five main recommendations, essentially dealing with the practice and procedure of the court. It was accepted that the setting up of the new court by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was a radical departure from the old jurisdiction arrangements where the patient’s property and affairs were dealt with by the old Court of Protection and their health and welfare by the High Court.

The divergence of practice and procedure between the courts was understandable but did not sit easily with either the transfer of the issues of both property and welfare to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll