header-logo header-logo

17 March 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7691 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Out on a limb?

001_nlj_7691_comment

Has Chancery Lane passed its sell-by date, asks Jon Robins

Michael Gove’s climb down over the bitter stand-off between his government and the legal aid profession provided a rare opportunity for uncomplicated delight for a beleaguered section of the profession. The Lord Chancellor unceremoniously ditched Chris Grayling’s tender plans for the duty contracts which would have threatened the livelihood of a large number of practitioners and put a second potentially devastating 8.75% fee cut on hold.

Emotions at Chancery Lane might be more complicated. In the eyes of the profession, it was a victory secured not by the profession’s main representative body but one that followed a campaign by the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association (LCCSA), the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA) and the Justice Alliance, a relatively new body set up in immediately after the April 2013 legal aid cuts disemboweled civil legal aid.

Having seen the civil legal aid scheme butchered with seemingly little attempt to win over the hearts and minds of the Great British public, the Justice Alliance sprang into

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll