header-logo header-logo

15 January 2021 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

John Le Carré: Open secrets

35785
In a tribute to John Le Carré, Athelstane Aamodt reflects on the operation & enforcement of official secrets laws

One of the things that nearly everyone knew about the late John Le Carré was that he had worked in British Intelligence, first for MI5 (domestic counter-intelligence) and then for MI6 (foreign intelligence). His life as an intelligence officer provided ample inspiration for his many novels. For years, the British Government would not even acknowledge the existence of MI5 and MI6. MI5 was first mentioned in parliament in 1952 and was recognised in law in 1989. MI6 (as well as GCHQ (signals intelligence)) were only formally acknowledged in 1994. Since then, things have changed remarkably: Stella Rimmington, a former director-general of MI5, and the first to be publicly identified as such, published her memoirs in 2001. MI5 now has a website. Richard Moore, the chief of MI6, has a Twitter account. We all know a great deal more about what the intelligence services do. Some things, however, we do not know, and we probably

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll