header-logo header-logo

Official receiver—Status—Whether exercising judicial function

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Howard) v Official Receiver [2013] EWHC 1839 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 73 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (Manchester), Stadlen J, 28 June 2013

A decision by the official receiver revoking a debt relief order is one that is made in the exercise of a judicial function, and is therefore not subject to the public sector equality duty in s 149 of the Equality Act 2010.

Ben McCormack (instructed by Oldham Citizens Advice Bureau) for the claimant. Scott Redpath (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

In May 2011, the claimant applied for and was granted a debt relief order (DRO). The claimant contended that she was a person with severe and long-standing health problems, which rendered her “disabled” for the purposes of s 6 of and Sch 1 to Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). In December 2011, the defendant official receiver decided to revoke the DRO on the ground that the claimant’s declared income would materially exceed the threshold allowed for monthly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll