header-logo header-logo

Offer to settle

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solomon v Cromwell Group plc; Oliver v Doughty [2011] EWCA Civ 1584, [2011] All ER (D) 148 (Dec)

The mechanism provided by CPR 44.12A was intended to apply both to cases settled through the operation of CPR Pt 36 and to those settled without recourse to it. The CPR had to be read in accordance with the established principle that where an instrument contained both general and specific provisions, some of which were in conflict, the general were intended to give way to the specific. CPR 36.10 contained rules of general application whereas section II of CPR Pt 45 contained rules specifically directed to a narrow class of cases.

Reading the CPR as a whole, there was no doubt that the intention was that section II of CPR 45 should govern the cases to which it applied to the exclusion of other rules that made different provision for the general run of cases. It was wrong to state that CPR 36.10(1) did not apply in a case where a CPR Pt 36 offer was made and accepted before proceedings were issued. The terms of CPR 36

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll