header-logo header-logo

06 August 2014
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Obesity ruling no “game changer”

An Advocate General’s Opinion that obesity can be classed as a disability under EU law is “not a game changer”, a leading employment lawyer has said.

Delivering his Opinion in Kaltoft v Kommunernes Landsforening, acting on behalf of the Municipality of Billund C-354/13 at the European Court of Justice (ECJ), AG Jääskinen said that morbid obesity could come within the meaning of “disability” if “it is of such a degree as to hinder full participation in professional life on an equal footing with other employees”. Therefore, only obesity severe enough to cause problems with mobility, stamina or mood would amount to disability.

Makbool Javaid, employment partner at Simons, Muirhead & Burton, says: “A lot of unrealistic publicity has surrounded this case, frightening people into thinking that the result could mean that ‘obesity’ in itself would be declared a disability in its own right...If the ECJ rules as I suspect it will, given the previous judgments, then there really should be no surprises when its definition is applied in UK law—yes, obese people could be protected but it depends on the facts and critically whether the person has a physical or mental impairment.”

Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll