header-logo header-logo

29 September 2020
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

No to extended hours

Criminal lawyers have decisively rejected proposals for extended operating hours (EOH) in courts, which they warn would hinder childcare arrangements and damage their health

Longer hours are currently being trialled at seven Crown courts, with 9am-1pm and 2pm-6pm shifts, while some magistrates’ courts are sitting on Saturdays. However, HM Courts and Tribunals has plans to expand Saturday courts and introduce weekday evening 5pm-8pm sessions.

A Women in Criminal Law (WICL) survey to gauge practitioners’ views received 480 responses, 72% of whom were women, and more than 200 respondents’ barristers of seven years’ call or more (https://bit.ly/3kYUpI7).

An overwhelming 88% opposed EOH outright, with 4% in favour and 8% neutral. Reasons given included the impact on childcare or other caring arrangements (41%), impact on mental or physical health (13%) and impact on work-life balance (43%).

Some 192 respondents were primary caregivers, who would find it difficult or impossible to attend EOH courts. The WICL report concludes ‘the vast majority of criminal practitioners have no more hours left to give’.

Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll