header-logo header-logo

No new guideline hourly rates

20 April 2015
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Master of the Rolls has decided to freeze the guideline hourly rates (GHRs), due to the poor response to its call for evidence. 

Lord Dyson initially said in July that he had no “evidential base” on which to make any changes to the GHRs, but would hold further discussions with the Law Society and government. 

Last week, he announced that these discussions had made no “material change” to the position. The GHRs will therefore remain at their current rates, which were set in 2010.

GHRs help judges assess costs by providing guidelines for the recoverable hourly rate for different grades of fee earner in different regions of England and Wales.

Lord Dyson said: “I am conscious of a number of trends in the legal services market and other factors that are rendering GHRs less and less relevant.” These include advances in technology and business practices; the “ever-increasing sub-specialisation of the law which is seeing the market increasingly dictate rates in some fields (particularly commercial law)”; “the judiciary’s use of proportionality as a driving principle in assessing costs”; and greater familiarity with costs budgeting among judiciary and practitioners alike.

He called for greater use of fixed costs in litigation.

Sue Nash, chairman of the Association of Costs Lawyers, says: “While any decision which gives certainty is to be welcomed, it is unfortunate that the costs committee was unable to fulfill its brief.  

“This was a golden opportunity for the legal profession to help shape the debate about the value of legal services but the outcome was made inevitable given the limited responses to the consultation coupled with the lack of resources afforded to the committee. It is difficult to see what other decision the Master of the Rolls could have taken in the circumstances.

“What will be interesting to see now is whether this will give added impetus to the increasingly wide variety of alternative fee and billing arrangements being entered between solicitors and their clients.”

 

Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll